3.22 FACULTY HANDBOOK
UNIVERSITY-WIDE ACADEMIC GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
I. Academic Grievances
A. A student academic
grievance is broadly defined as a student complaint regarding an
academic action taken by instructional or administrative personnel
at The University of Alabama. An academic grievance may be filed by
a student against university personnel including instructional
personnel, administrators, or staff members at the University.
Examples of academic grievances include, but are not limited to,
allegations of unfairness in grading, alleged violation of a written
or oral agreement with a student (e.g. course requirements for
graduation), and alleged inconsistent applications of existing
policies.
For a protest of a final course grade or other final comprehensive
evaluations to be considered, the protest must be based upon one or
more of the following grounds and upon allegation that the ground or
grounds cited influenced the grade assignment to the student's
detriment:
1. Arithmetic or clerical error
2. Arbitrariness, possibly including discrimination based upon race,
sex, religion, or national origin of the student
3. Personal malice
Grievances related to course grades normally should be filed during
the semester in which the alleged action takes place, but such
protest must be made not later than the last day of classes of the
next succeeding regular semester. This grievance procedure is not
available in cases where a decision has been appealed, and been
afforded a committee hearing, and the appeal has been denied.
B. A student must file a
grievance in the academic department (academic department is a
phrase that also refers to academic program or area if these terms
apply) of The University of Alabama in which the alleged action took
place. Academic grievances shall be resolved by the department head
in the division where the grievance took place. Grievances
concerning matters that are not within the jurisdiction of a
particular academic division and grievances against the divisional
academic dean must be resolved by the Provost/Vice President for
Academic Affairs. Grievances against the department chairperson must
be resolved by the divisional academic dean. Appeals from the
academic dean's decisions may also be made to the Provost/Vice
President for Academic Affairs.
II. Resolution by Department
Chairperson
A. A student who believes
that an academic action has unjustly affected him/her may file a
grievance with the department chairperson. The facts and
circumstances which are bases for the academic grievance should be
presented to the department chairperson in written form.
B. The department chairperson will schedule a conference with
the student who has brought the grievance, reissue the student a
copy of the University-wide Academic Grievance Procedures, ascertain
the circumstances involved, and review any materials or
circumstances pertinent to the grievance to determine if there seems
to be a reasonable or sound basis for the academic grievance. If the
chairperson decides there may be a reasonable or sound basis for the
academic grievance, or if the student insists on filing the
grievance anyway, then the department chairperson will arrange
conferences with the student and other person(s) involved.
Prior to these conferences, the other person(s) involved will be
given a copy of the written grievance and will be reissued a copy of
the University-wide Academic Grievance Procedures. Both the student
and other person(s) will be informed that the purpose of conferences
scheduled by the department chairperson is to attempt to resolve the
issue informally. Both parties will be informed that they have the
right to present any evidence, supporting witnesses, or any other
relevant information during these conferences.
C. At the beginning of these conferences, the department
chairperson will inform the student and other person(s) involved
that the purpose of these meetings is to attempt to resolve the
grievances informally. The department chairperson will act as
intermediary between the student and other individual(s) with whom
the student has a dispute. If a mutually satisfactory resolution can
be reached, the academic grievance is resolved.
D. If a resolution cannot be reached informally between the
student and other person(s) involved, then the matter will be
forwarded to the academic dean to be resolved.
III. Resolution by Academic
Dean
Any matter not resolved by the
department chairperson will be resolved by the academic dean. The
dean may act alone or in the conjunction with a standing divisional
committee or an ad hoc committee appointed by the dean, but the dean
will make the decision. The academic dean will arrange conferences
with the faculty or staff member, student, and others, as may be
appropriate, to discuss the matter in question. The student and
other person(s) involved will be given an opportunity to make a
statement, present evidence, witnesses, or materials pertinent to
the academic grievance; during these conferences both parties can be
accompanied or advised by anyone either party chooses. The academic
dean, after careful deliberation, will render a decision.
Notice of the dean's decision will be sent by certified mail to the
student with copies to the faculty or staff member and other
involved parties; either party may appeal the dean's decision to the
Office for Academic Affairs if the appeal is filed within 15 working
days of the date of mailing of the dean's decision.
IV. Appeal
The dean's decision may be appealed
to the Office for Academic Affairs within 15 working days of the
mailing of the dean's decision. Appeals must be based on substantive
grounds such as procedural errors, new information, or
inconsistencies in the application of policies.
When an appeal is received by the Office for Academic Affairs, an
official from that office will schedule a conference(s) with the
student and other concerned parties to discuss the reasons for the
appeal. If meetings with the student and other concerned parties
result in an agreeable solution to the matter, the appeal process
will end. If no such solution is reached, the official from the
Office for Academic Affairs will recommend to the Provost/Vice
President for Academic Affairs, giving reasons for the
recommendation, whether the appeal should be heard or denied. If the
Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs denies the appeal, the
appeal process will end. If the appeal is to be heard, the official
from the Office for Academic Affairs will convene a panel to resolve
the issues that remain. The panel will consist of a person
designated by the Vice President for Student Affairs, a person
designated by the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs (not
the official convening the panel), one student (appointed by the
President of the SGA), and one faculty member (appointed by the
President of the Faculty Senate); both the student and the faculty
member will come from the division holding jurisdiction for
resolving the academic grievance if it is possible to find such
people who have no prior connection with the case. In cases
involving graduate students, the faculty and student members of the
appeal panel should hold graduate faculty or graduate student status
respectively. The person designated by the Provost/Vice President
for Academic Affairs will serve as hearing administrator and will
coordinate and preside at all meetings conducted to resolve the
academic grievance appeal.
The hearing by a panel is an
administrative hearing and the proceedings will be informal rather
than those used in courts of law. The panel may admit any evidence
which is of probative value in determining the issues, subject to
the panel's judgment as to the relevance, credibility, and weight of
the evidence. The panel may ask the parties to produce evidence on
specific issues, may examine witnesses, and may call and examine its
own witnesses. The student may be represented at the hearing by a
person of his or her choice; if the student is represented by an
attorney, then the other parties may be represented by a person from
the Office of the University Counsel. Each party (or the
representative of the party) will have the right to confront and
cross-examine all opposing witnesses. The panel will decide each of
the issues raised in the appeal. The panel's decision will be final
and will conclude the process insofar as the University is
concerned.
A decision contrary to the student's position must be supported by
the votes of at least three of the four panel members. The panel
will give written notice of its decision to the student, the faculty
or staff member, the dean, and the Provost/Vice President for
Academic Affairs.
|